img

Why can geopolitical naivety pose serious risks for businesses?

Geopolitics is no longer just about borders, sanctions, or trade flows. It’s about narratives. Whoever controls a narrative shapes how the world is perceived. “Dependence on China,” “Western decadence,” “Security through self-sufficiency.”These are not neutral descriptions—they are political weapons. They shape headlines, influence investment decisions, and either bolster or destroy a company’s reputation. And any company that believes it is immune is gravely mistaken. Narratives always find their targets.

The uncomfortable truth: every board member is already in the middle of this battle for interpretation, whether they realize it or not. A CEO who casually drops a seemingly harmless remark in an interview can inadvertently validate a geopolitical narrative. Suddenly, the company appears in headlines as a “plaything of an autocrat” or a “profiteer of war.” Trust and credibility, built over years, can vanish in seconds. Underestimating the power of narratives is reckless.

Reading balance sheets, approving strategies, and enforcing compliance is no longer enough. Leadership today requires attention to invisible battlegrounds—narratives are exactly that. They are subtle, persistent, and influential. Ignoring them risks unconsciously adopting them. And once a narrative is adopted, a company loses not just its communicative sovereignty but also its ability to define its own position.

Boards must learn to read narratives like a second language. What interests lie behind an NGO statement? Who benefits if a certain frame dominates the debate? Why is a particular headline being spun now? These are not questions for political scientists alone—they belong in the toolkit of every CEO and board member. If you do not ask them, others will answer for you, often at the company’s expense.

No one expects every board member to become an expert in geopolitical rhetoric. But every board must have access to this expertise—through trained internal communications teams or external advisors who can decode geopolitical signals. This is not optional; it is essential. Anything less is a gamble with the company’s reputation.

The conclusion is simple but stark: geopolitical narratives are not a sideshow—they are a source of power. Those who ignore them are used. Those who understand them can shape outcomes. Boardrooms in the 21st century must cultivate the skill to interpret geopolitical narratives and the judgment to secure the right support. Anything else is naivety. Geopolitical naivety. Dangerous, costly naivety that no board can afford today.

Share this article:
img
Author

Christian F. Hirsch

Senior Consultant, KR Krisensicher Risikoberatung GmbH

Christian F. Hirsch is a cultural studies graduate, reserve staff officer, and seasoned communications expert with extensive experience in leadership, organizational development, and media relations. He has a particular passion for handling complex and sensitive communication challenges. In the past, he served as the spokesperson for the defense division of the Carl Zeiss Group. Today, he works as Chief of Staff at KR Krisensicher Risk Consulting, where he helps organizations strengthen their resilience to crises and conflict in an age defined by polycrisis, hybrid warfare, and renewed geopolitical tension. As the founder and driving force behind the blog, Christian writes primarily about the evolving concept of Corporate Geopolitics, Geopolitical Corporate Communications (GeoComms), and Geopolitical Leadership—exploring how businesses can navigate global complexity with strategic awareness and communication excellence. He can be reached at christianfhirsch@boardroomgeopolitics.de